Terms of use

Updated on June 23th, 2026

Accessibility Statement

This statement was drafted on 04/29/2026 for the website https://www.bonsoirs.com/en-ww.

It is valid from the date of publication, must be updated after 3 years, following major changes to the website, or 18 months after a new version of the reference framework.


Bonsoirs' Commitment

Bonsoirs is committed to making its websites, mobile applications, intranet, extranet, and software accessible in accordance with Article 47 of French Law No. 2005-102 of February 11, 2005.

We value inclusion and diversity, and we ensure that our website https://www.bonsoirs.com/en-ww is accessible to everyone, including people with disabilities.

As part of this digital accessibility initiative, we collaborate with Accessiway. We are firmly committed to a web for all. With a long-term and responsible vision, we aim to fully meet regulatory requirements, including RGAA 4.1.2 and the European standard EN 301 549.


Compliance Status

The website https://www.bonsoirs.com/en-ww has an accessibility rate of 50.00% and is therefore partially compliant with the General Accessibility Improvement Framework (RGAA 4.1.2).


Test Results

The compliance audit conducted on 04/29/2026 by AccessiWay reveals that 50.00% of the RGAA version 4.1.2 criteria are met.

Breakdown of Results

  • Number of compliant criteria: 31

  • Number of non-compliant criteria: 31

  • Number of not-applicable criteria: 44


Inaccessible Content

The content listed below is not accessible for the following reasons.

Non-Compliance

  • 1.1 – Does every informative image have a text alternative? Some non-text content presented to the user does not have an equivalent text alternative serving the same purpose.

  • 1.2 – Is every decorative image correctly ignored by assistive technologies? Some decorative images are not ignored by assistive technologies.

  • 1.3 – For each informative image with a text alternative, is that alternative relevant (except in special cases)? Some text alternatives associated with informative images are not relevant.

  • 1.8 – Where possible, should informative text images be replaced by styled text in the absence of a replacement mechanism? Is this rule followed (except in special cases)? Some images containing text have not been replaced by styled text where this was possible.

  • 3.2 – On each web page, is the contrast between text color and background color sufficiently high (except in special cases)? The contrast between text and its background is insufficient on some web pages.

  • 3.3 – On each web page, are the colors used in interface components or informative graphical elements sufficiently contrasted (except in special cases)? The colors used in some interface components or informative graphical elements do not provide sufficient contrast.

  • 6.1 – Is each link explicit (except in special cases)? Some links do not clearly indicate their destination or function.

  • 6.2 – On each web page, does each link have a label? Some links on the page have no label.

  • 7.1 – Where necessary, is each script compatible with assistive technologies? Some scripts are not compatible with assistive technologies where required.

  • 7.3 – Is each script controllable by keyboard and any pointing device (except in special cases)? Some scripts cannot be controlled via keyboard or any pointing device.

  • 7.4 – For each script that triggers a context change, is the user warned or given control? For some scripts that trigger a context change, the user is not notified.

  • 7.5 – On each web page, are status messages correctly rendered by assistive technologies? Some status messages are not correctly rendered by assistive technologies.

  • 8.6 – For each web page with a page title, is that title relevant? Some page titles are not relevant to the content.

  • 8.7 – On each web page, is each language change indicated in the source code (except in special cases)? Some language changes present in the source code are not indicated.

  • 8.9 – On each web page, tags must not be used solely for presentation purposes. Is this rule followed? Some tags are used solely for presentation purposes.

  • 9.1 – On each web page, is information structured through the appropriate use of headings? Information is not correctly structured through the appropriate use of headings on some pages.

  • 9.3 – On each web page, is each list correctly structured? Some lists on web pages are not correctly structured.

  • 9.4 – On each web page, is each quotation correctly indicated? Some quotations are not correctly indicated.

  • 10.1 – On the website, are stylesheets used to control the presentation of information? Some web pages do not use stylesheets to control the presentation of information.

  • 10.6 – On each web page, is each link whose nature is not obvious visible relative to the surrounding text? Some links whose nature is not obvious are not visually distinguishable from the surrounding text.

  • 10.7 – On each web page, is focus visible for each element that receives focus? Focus is not visible on some elements that receive focus.

  • 10.8 – On each web page, is hidden content intended to be ignored by assistive technologies? Some hidden content is not correctly ignored by assistive technologies.

  • 10.14 – On each web page, can additional content appearing via CSS styles only be made visible by keyboard and any pointing device? Some additional content appearing via CSS styles cannot be made visible by keyboard or any pointing device.

  • 11.5 – In each form, are fields of the same type grouped together where necessary? Fields of the same type are not grouped together where required.

  • 11.10 – In each form, is input validation used in a relevant manner (except in special cases)? Some input validation controls are not used in a relevant manner.

  • 11.11 – In each form, where necessary, is input validation accompanied by suggestions to help correct input errors? Some input validation controls are not accompanied by suggestions to help correct errors where required.

  • 11.13 – Can the purpose of an input field be inferred to facilitate autofill with the user's data? The purpose of some input fields cannot be inferred to facilitate autofill with user data.

  • 12.7 – On each web page, is a skip link or quick-access link to the main content area present (except in special cases)? A skip link or quick-access link to the main content area is not present on some pages.

  • 12.8 – On each web page, is the tab order consistent? The tab order is not consistent on some pages.

  • 12.11 – On each web page, is additional content appearing on hover, focus, or activation of an interface component reachable by keyboard where necessary? Some additional content appearing on hover, focus, or activation of an interface component is not reachable by keyboard.

  • 13.8 – On each web page, can every moving or blinking element be controlled by the user? Some moving or blinking content cannot be controlled by the user.

An accessible alternative version is available if you configure the appropriate adjustments to meet your needs via the AccessiWay widget interface (overlay). For full functionality, the widget must be fully loaded and the adjustments activated. Incorrect configuration of the widget may reduce the accessibility of the site.


Exemptions for Disproportionate Burden

No content to report.


Content Not Subject to the Accessibility Obligation

No content to report.


Establishment of This Accessibility Statement

This statement was established on 04/29/2026.


Technologies Used to Build the Website

  • HTML5

  • CSS

  • JavaScript


Testing Environment

Operating Systems

(Latest available versions)

  • Apple macOS

  • Microsoft Windows

  • Apple iOS

  • Google Android

Browsers and Software

(Latest available versions across operating systems)

  • Google Chrome

  • Microsoft Edge

  • Safari

  • Brave

  • Adobe Acrobat Reader / Preview on Mac (for PDFs only)

Accessibility Evaluation Tools

  • Mouse, magnifier, and on-screen keyboard emulations across various operating systems

  • VoiceOver (Apple systems only)

  • TalkBack (Android only)

  • NVDA 2025 and Freedom Scientific JAWS 2022 (PC systems only)

  • Tanaguru Webext RGAA4

  • RGAA Assistant

  • Graphical evaluation tools available across various systems (colors, contrast, subtitles, etc.)


Website Pages Reviewed for Compliance

  • Home

  • Contact

  • Legal Notice

  • Sign In

  • Search Results

  • Collection: Throws & Blankets

  • Collection: Gifts for Women

  • Product: Fluffy Bathrobe

  • Gift Card

  • Professional Space

  • Checkout


Feedback and Contact

If you are unable to access content or a service, you may contact the Bonsoirs accessibility officer at accessibilite@bonsoirs.com to be directed to an accessible alternative or to obtain the content in another format.


Recourse Options

If you identify an accessibility issue preventing you from accessing content or a feature of the website, and after reporting it to us you are unable to obtain a response, you are entitled to submit your complaint or a referral request to the Défenseur des droits (French Rights Defender). Several options are available:

  • Submit a message to the Défenseur des droits

  • Contact the regional delegate of the Défenseur des droits in your area

  • Send a letter (free of charge, no stamp required):

Défenseur des droits Libre réponse 71120 75342 Paris CEDEX 07 France